All posts
Chandling · Proof·24 June 2025·3 min read

The shortage we caught before delivery — and why the Master never had to write that email

One consignment, one missing case of eggs, one 06:15 phone call. The kind of small catch that decides whether a chandler is trusted.

A short story from last month, because it is the kind of thing that never quite makes it into a case study — but it is exactly why clients stay.

The requisition

Routine fresh provisions for a container vessel alongside. 82 lines. Delivery scheduled 08:30. Included in the order: four cases of eggs, 30-count.

The catch, 06:15

During the warehouse packing check, our coordinator noticed that only three of the four cases were present. The fourth case had been logged in yesterday but not physically received — a vendor short-shipment discovered at packing.

What we did

Called our backup vendor at 06:20. Case sourced and en route by 06:45. Delivered to warehouse 07:20. Loaded on the van at 07:35. Delivery on the gangway at 08:31 — a minute past the scheduled time, complete.

The Master was told, on the delivery note, that one case had been substituted from a backup vendor. No shortage. No complaint email.

What did not happen

The vessel did not receive a short consignment. The Master did not open a case and count to three instead of four at the Chief Cook's request. Our coordinator did not have to write a "we are sorry" note.

Why we are boring about this

Because the difference between a chandler you use once and a chandler you stay with for years is exactly this: the small catches that never generate a story on their own. They generate the absence of a story — which is what "reliable" actually means.

Message us and ask for a reference vessel we currently supply. We will connect you.